Skip to main content

Perez v. State

Citations

  • 113 S.W.3d 819
  • 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 6935
  • 2003 WL 21939034

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any error in the admission of hearsay testimony was harmless in light of other properly admitted evidence proving same fact
  • holding that any error in the admission of hearsay testimony was harmless in light of other properly admitted evidence providing the same facts
  • holding that any error in the admission of hearsay testimony was harmless in light of other properly admitted evidence providing the same facts
  • noting that difficulty of deliberations and receipt of Allen charge are “interesting,” but not evidence to consider in factual sufficiency analysis
  • statements made to licensed professional counselor not working under supervision of medical professional were not made for purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment
  • improper admission of evidence not reversible error when same facts proved by other properly admitted evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Law, Smith, Onion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

189 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.