LACAZE v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing the admission of testimony that was both (1) referenced in the appellant’s brief and (2) objected to at trial
• reviewing the admission of testimony that was both (1) referenced in the appellant’s brief and (2) objected to at trial
• reviewing the admission of testimony that was both (1) referenced in the appellant’s brief and (2) objected to at trial
• reviewing the admission of testimony that was both (1) referenced in the appellant’s brief and (2) objected to at trial
• “[A]n objection to hearsay does not preserve error based on a violation of the Confrontation Clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).