Skip to main content

Raymond Lumsden v. State

Citations

  • 564 S.W.3d 858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court’s erroneous admission of evidence will not require reversal when other such evidence was received without objection, either before or after the complained-of ruling
  • one reliability factor includes “whether the child understands the need to tell the truth and has the ability to observe, recollect, and narrate”
  • “[W]e held that [the SANE’s] testimony was admissible under the medical-diagnosis-or-treatment exception to the hearsay rule. Her handwritten report is similarly admissible under the medical-diagnosis-or-treatment exception to the hearsay rule.”
  • “[W]e held that [the SANE’s] testimony was admissible under the medical-diagnosis-or-treatment exception to the hearsay rule. Her handwritten report is similarly admissible under the medical-diagnosis-or-treatment exception to the hearsay rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

77 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Raymond Lumsden v. State

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.