Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/11/2018
Gonzalez v. State
Citations
- 544 S.W.3d 363
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that error was harmless because “[t]he entirety of the [improperly admitted] evidence . . . was elicited in five pages of the State’s thirty-two page cross-examination of Appellant”
- holding admission of evidence harmless and noting that the entirety of the evidence was “elicited in five pages”
- explaining that evidence is relevant if it “provides a small nudge toward proving or disproving a fact of consequence”
- explaining that appellate courts review rulings admitting evidence under an abuse of discretion standard
- explaining that appellate courts review rulings admitting evidence under an abuse of discretion standard
- explaining that appellate courts review rulings admitting evidence under abuse-of-discretion standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
322 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Richard Cruz v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2018-10-24· cited 17×
- Christopher Harris v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2019-03-13· cited 17×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2018-07-23· cited 11×
- in the Interest of A.F.C., I.C.C., A.R.H., Jr., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2017-07-26
- Cuong Tran v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2018-06-26
- Gary James Cummings v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2018-07-31
- Michael David Holley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2018-08-07
- Aspen Warren v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2018-08-09
- William James Crenan v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2018-08-15
- Daer Amador v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2018-10-05
- Stefan Rainer Forkert v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2018-10-04
- Robert Wayne Longoria v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2018-10-25
- Theodore Timothy Demaree v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2018-11-01
- Michael James Aguilar v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2018-11-29
- Samuel Tucker v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2018-12-12
- Claudio Alberto Morales v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2018-12-27
- Jose Angel Rivera v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2019-02-12
- Barbara Galindo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2019-02-12
- Antoine Allen Gorman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2019-02-14
- Marvin Dayvon Brown v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2019-07-18
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-19· cited 7,264×
- Guevara v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-10-20· cited 1,613×
- Motilla v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-06-26· cited 1,558×
- Gigliobianco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-12-20· cited 1,113×
- Moses v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-05-21· cited 1,033×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-10-29· cited 801×
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-12-15· cited 763×
- Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-09-25· cited 705×
- State v. MechlerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-01-12· cited 667×
- Manning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-09-10· cited 315×
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-05-28· cited 257×
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-03-03· cited 206×
- Smithhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-12-12· cited 70×
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-03-21· cited 56×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.