Skip to main content

Gonzalez v. State

Citations

  • 544 S.W.3d 363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that error was harmless because “[t]he entirety of the [improperly admitted] evidence . . . was elicited in five pages of the State’s thirty-two page cross-examination of Appellant”
  • holding admission of evidence harmless and noting that the entirety of the evidence was “elicited in five pages”
  • explaining that evidence is relevant if it “provides a small nudge toward proving or disproving a fact of consequence”
  • explaining that appellate courts review rulings admitting evidence under an abuse of discretion standard
  • explaining that appellate courts review rulings admitting evidence under an abuse of discretion standard
  • explaining that appellate courts review rulings admitting evidence under abuse-of-discretion standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

322 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.