Skip to main content

McDonald v. State

Citations

  • 179 S.W.3d 571
  • 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2010
  • 2005 WL 3117336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that constitutional error is not involved when extraneous-offense evidence is admitted without notice
  • holding that constitutional error is not involved when extraneous-offense evidence is admitted without notice
  • concluding that because appellant objected only to the lack of notice and did not object to the admissibility of the uncharged misconduct itself, the court only \look[ed] at the harm that may have been caused by the lack of notice\
  • concluding that because appellant objected only to the lack of notice and did not object to the admissibility of the uncharged misconduct itself, the court only \look[ed] at the harm that may have been caused by the lack of notice\
  • concluding in part that no harm resulted from lack of notice because if defendant had been legitimately surprised, he could have requested a continuance
  • concluding in part that no harm resulted from lack of notice because if defendant had been legitimately surprised, he could have requested a continuance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Keller, Meyers, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Holcomb, Cochran, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

433 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named McDonald v. State

393 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.