Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 178 S.W.3d 806
  • 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1865
  • 2005 WL 2861055

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a child’s outcry statement regarding an offense is “substantive evidence of the crime”
  • holding that, while hearsay statements are generally inadmissible, they may be admitted “when public policy supports their use, and the circumstances surrounding the making of those statements pedigree their reliability”
  • stating that outcry statute serves society's interest in \protecting children in court by allowing the admission of their casual 'street corner' confidences to an adult\
  • noting that hearsay exception for outcry \carefully limited\ and applicable only when \specified conditions\ are met
  • stating that outcry statute serves society’s interest in “protecting children in court by allowing the admission of their casual ‘street corner’ confidences to an adult”
  • noting that hearsay exception for outcry \carefully limited” and applicable only when \specified conditions” are met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

164 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.