Arizona Supreme Court· 10/16/1991
State v. Schaaf
Citations
- 819 P.2d 909
- 169 Ariz. 323
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an objection to testimony as cumulative did not preserve a claim of error on the ground of probing work product
- holding that questioning prospective jurors about their position on the death sentence is permissible to determine whether jurors can perform their duties
- finding that because a defendant failed to raise in the trial court either federal or state constitutional claims that his right to speedy trial was violated, the defendant's claims were waived absent fundamental error
- finding that because a defendant failed to raise in the trial court either federal or state constitutional claims that his right to speedy trial was violated, the defendant’s claims were waived absent fundamental error
- holding a defendant waives a speedy violation absent a prompt assertion of the right
- stating that failure to timely object below waives right to raise argument on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Moeller, Corcoran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 361×
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-13· cited 326×
- State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court· 2006-08-14· cited 207×
- State v. GulbrandsonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 189×
- State v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 180×
- State v. SpreitzArizona Supreme Court· 1997-09-11· cited 122×
- State v. StuardArizona Supreme Court· 1993-11-18· cited 121×
- State v. DickensArizona Supreme Court· 1996-10-31· cited 112×
- State v. Van AdamsArizona Supreme Court· 1999-06-18· cited 112×
- State of Arizona v. Steven John ParkerArizona Supreme Court· 2013-03-13· cited 110×
- State v. RunningeagleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-04-20· cited 82×
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 2007-05-31· cited 79×
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court· 1995-09-26· cited 79×
- State v. ScottArizona Supreme Court· 1993-12-21· cited 68×
- State v. HenryArizona Supreme Court· 1993-11-12· cited 64×
- State v. MurdaughArizona Supreme Court· 2004-09-15· cited 58×
- State v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court· 1996-07-02· cited 57×
- State v. WaldenArizona Supreme Court· 1995-10-10· cited 56×
- State of Arizona v. William Craig MillerArizona Supreme Court· 2013-12-27· cited 52×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- Edmonds v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 261×
- State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-01· cited 219×
- State v. LaversArizona Supreme Court· 1991-07-23· cited 189×
- United States v. Roland A. SoulardNinth Circuit· 1984-04-12· cited 157×
- State v. ConnerArizona Supreme Court· 1990-01-09· cited 148×
- State v. MataArizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-11· cited 117×
- State v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court· 1981-11-06· cited 116×
- State v. ZuckArizona Supreme Court· 1982-11-15· cited 115×
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court· 1988-09-22· cited 105×
- State v. FierroaArizona Supreme Court· 1990-12-18· cited 105×
- State v. Martinez-VillarealArizona Supreme Court· 1985-07-10· cited 98×
- State v. LaGrandArizona Supreme Court· 1987-01-30· cited 95×
- State v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court· 1991-07-16· cited 95×
- Wainwright v. BoykinsSupreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 91×
- State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court· 1984-10-30· cited 85×
- State v. NealArizona Supreme Court· 1984-12-04· cited 83×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.