Skip to main content

State v. Thomas

Citations

  • 636 P.2d 1214
  • 130 Ariz. 432
  • 27 A.L.R. 4th 1158
  • 1981 Ariz. LEXIS 257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that error is not fundamental if it did not “contribute significantly” to the verdict
  • holding that error is not fundamental if it did not \contribute significantly\ to the verdict
  • observing that “any evidence which substantiates the credibility of a prosecuting witness on the question of guilt is relevant and material”
  • evidence of victim’s personality changes after incident relevant and admissible in prosecution for sexual abuse and sexual conduct with a minor
  • evidence of victim's personality changes after incident relevant and admissible in prosecution for sexual abuse and sexual conduct with a minor
  • “If ... error occurred, the prejudicial nature of the unobjeeted-to error must be evaluated in light of the entire record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hays, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Gordon, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.