Arizona Supreme Court· 11/6/1981
State v. Thomas
Citations
- 636 P.2d 1214
- 130 Ariz. 432
- 27 A.L.R. 4th 1158
- 1981 Ariz. LEXIS 257
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that error is not fundamental if it did not “contribute significantly” to the verdict
- holding that error is not fundamental if it did not \contribute significantly\ to the verdict
- observing that “any evidence which substantiates the credibility of a prosecuting witness on the question of guilt is relevant and material”
- evidence of victim’s personality changes after incident relevant and admissible in prosecution for sexual abuse and sexual conduct with a minor
- evidence of victim's personality changes after incident relevant and admissible in prosecution for sexual abuse and sexual conduct with a minor
- “If ... error occurred, the prejudicial nature of the unobjeeted-to error must be evaluated in light of the entire record.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hays, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Gordon, Holohan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 1,009×
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court· 2004-08-09· cited 424×
- State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-01· cited 219×
- State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court· 1995-10-26· cited 217×
- State v. AdamsonArizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-11· cited 201×
- State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court· 2005-05-04· cited 191×
- State v. LaversArizona Supreme Court· 1991-07-23· cited 189×
- State v. CarrigerArizona Supreme Court· 1984-12-06· cited 174×
- State v. McCallArizona Supreme Court· 1983-11-09· cited 164×
- State v. GallegosArizona Supreme Court· 1994-03-15· cited 158×
- State v. CorrellArizona Supreme Court· 1986-01-28· cited 157×
- State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court· 1989-07-11· cited 146×
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-02-04· cited 119×
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court· 1988-09-22· cited 105×
- State v. ComerArizona Supreme Court· 1990-07-31· cited 104×
- People v. HaymakerSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-04-21· cited 84×
- State v. McNairArizona Supreme Court· 1984-09-05· cited 82×
- State v. HenleyArizona Supreme Court· 1984-05-01· cited 81×
- State v. ClaflinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-11-06· cited 80×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 2,732×
- People v. HallMichigan Supreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 125×
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1977-02-24· cited 89×
- State v. PulliamArizona Supreme Court· 1960-03-02· cited 81×
- State v. MosleyArizona Supreme Court· 1978-06-27· cited 76×
- State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court· 1973-12-20· cited 71×
- State v. CobbArizona Supreme Court· 1977-06-01· cited 49×
- State v. ShingArizona Supreme Court· 1973-05-07· cited 40×
- State v. BowieArizona Supreme Court· 1978-06-23· cited 34×
- Tucker v. ReilArizona Supreme Court· 1938-03-07· cited 33×
- State v. PeelerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-04-22· cited 28×
- State v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court· 1980-01-07· cited 28×
- State v. GambleArizona Supreme Court· 1974-06-05· cited 28×
- State v. BacaArizona Supreme Court· 1967-03-15· cited 28×
- State v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court· 1976-07-15· cited 21×
- People v. WellsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1978-04-17· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.