Arizona Supreme Court· 3/11/1980
State v. Mata
Citations
- 609 P.2d 48
- 125 Ariz. 233
- 1980 Ariz. LEXIS 184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a prosecutor’s remarks did not “support an unfavorable inference” when “the remarks were inadvertent and immediately corrected”
- concluding that court’s communication with a juror “through the bailiff” was not “reversible” error
- “The general rule in Arizona is that reversible error occurs when a trial judge communicates with jurors after they have retired to deliberate, unless defendant and counsel have been notified and given an opportunity to be present.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Struckmeyer, Holohan, Hays, Cameron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-06· cited 374×
- State v. EllisonArizona Supreme Court· 2006-08-09· cited 257×
- State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-01· cited 219×
- State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court· 2005-05-04· cited 191×
- State v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court· 1980-07-25· cited 189×
- State v. Soto-FongArizona Supreme Court· 1996-11-19· cited 182×
- State v. OsbornIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-07-09· cited 167×
- State v. McCallArizona Supreme Court· 1983-11-09· cited 164×
- State v. CorrellArizona Supreme Court· 1986-01-28· cited 157×
- State v. DannArizona Supreme Court· 2009-05-19· cited 146×
- State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court· 1989-07-11· cited 146×
- State v. SchrockArizona Supreme Court· 1986-03-31· cited 136×
- State v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-28· cited 135×
- State v. RoscoeArizona Supreme Court· 1984-12-28· cited 125×
- State v. BeatyArizona Supreme Court· 1988-11-01· cited 115×
- State v. ClabourneArizona Supreme Court· 1984-10-31· cited 112×
- State v. Van AdamsArizona Supreme Court· 1999-06-18· cited 112×
- State v. OrtizArizona Supreme Court· 1981-11-23· cited 110×
- State v. JordanArizona Supreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 108×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 1,798×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 1,267×
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 1,077×
- Parker v. RandolphSupreme Court· 1979-05-29· cited 590×
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-06-17· cited 585×
- Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court· 1978-03-22· cited 380×
- State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 250×
- State v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court· 1978-07-20· cited 206×
- Broncucia v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 188×
- State v. CookArizona Supreme Court· 1977-04-25· cited 74×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.