Arizona Supreme Court· 7/2/1996

State v. Rodriguez

Citations

921 P.2d 643
186 Ariz. 240
221 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 5
1996 Ariz. LEXIS 73

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the Arizona Supreme Court has “consistently held, as a 3 matter of law, that polygraph evidence is not reliable”
despite violation of Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, conviction may still stand if error found harmless
“Absent a clear abuse of discretion, we will not second-guess a trial court’s ruling on the admissibility or relevance of evidence.”
“A reasonable person would assume that police understood the boundaries of the law.”
“A reasonable person would assume that police understood the boundaries of the law.”
state's failure to argue harmless error concedes point

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moeller, Feldman, Zlaket, Martone, Corcoran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.