Arizona Supreme Court· 12/4/1984
State v. Neal
Citations
- 692 P.2d 272
- 143 Ariz. 93
- 1984 Ariz. LEXIS 309
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant’s truthfulness and the credibility of and weight to be given expert medical testimony are issues of fact for jury
- holding that defendant's truthfulness and the credibility of and weight to be given expert medical testimony are issues of fact for jury
- ruling that the probative value of the murder victim’s blood level for cocaine and quaaludes was so slight that it was outweighed by the dangers of prejudice and confusion was within the trial court’s sound discretion
- noting that the “length of time could have been as instantaneous as it takes to form successive thoughts in the mind”
- noting that the \length of time could have been as instantaneous as it takes to form successive thoughts in the mind\
- noting that the “length of time could have been as instantaneous as it takes to form successive thoughts in the mind”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hays, Holohan, Gordon, Cameron, Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court· 2004-08-09· cited 424×
- State v. WestArizona Supreme Court· 2011-05-12· cited 376×
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 361×
- State v. MathersArizona Supreme Court· 1990-06-26· cited 201×
- State v. LaversArizona Supreme Court· 1991-07-23· cited 189×
- State v. HarmCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-01-13· cited 179×
- State of Arizona v. Mark GoudeauArizona Supreme Court· 2016-06-17· cited 125×
- Clabourne v. LewisNinth Circuit· 1995-09-08· cited 125×
- Warren Wesley Summerlin v. Dora B. Schriro, Director of Arizona Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 2005-10-17· cited 121×
- Cook v. SchriroNinth Circuit· 2008-08-13· cited 108×
- State of Arizona v. Joel Randu Escalante-OrozcoArizona Supreme Court· 2017-01-12· cited 102×
- State v. StanleyArizona Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 96×
- State v. LandriganArizona Supreme Court· 1993-02-25· cited 96×
- Warren Wesley Summerlin v. Terry L. Stewart, Director of Arizona Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 2003-09-02· cited 93×
- State v. MauroArizona Supreme Court· 1988-12-01· cited 75×
- State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-08-22· cited 69×
- State v. SchaafArizona Supreme Court· 1991-10-16· cited 65×
- State v. BorbonArizona Supreme Court· 1985-09-06· cited 63×
- State v. LopezArizona Supreme Court· 1990-01-16· cited 58×
- State v. CookArizona Supreme Court· 1991-12-05· cited 55×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 2,209×
- State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-01· cited 219×
- State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court· 1984-06-14· cited 190×
- State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court· 1984-09-25· cited 138×
- State v. ZuckArizona Supreme Court· 1982-11-15· cited 115×
- State v. VickersArizona Supreme Court· 1981-06-01· cited 97×
- State v. AxleyArizona Supreme Court· 1982-05-10· cited 89×
- State v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court· 1982-10-18· cited 77×
- State v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 56×
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 56×
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court· 1982-03-26· cited 47×
- State v. LacqueyArizona Supreme Court· 1977-11-15· cited 31×
- State v. GansterArizona Supreme Court· 1967-11-17· cited 28×
- State v. SchantzArizona Supreme Court· 1967-05-11· cited 15×
- State v. MoyaArizona Supreme Court· 1981-04-30· cited 13×
- State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-02-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.