Skip to main content
· 4/12/1984

United States v. Roland A. Soulard

Citations

  • 730 F.2d 1292
  • 15 Fed. R. Serv. 1090
  • 53 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1128
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that summary charts are not to be admitted in evidence or used by the jury during deliberations but can be used as “testimonial aids” during the agent’s testimony and during closing arguments
  • explaining that a bank deposits analysis requires that amounts deposited into bank accounts be increased by income not deposited into the bank accounts (citing United States v. Hall , 650 F.2d 994 , 996 n.4 (9th Cir. 1981))
  • affirming the district court's 26 admission of expert testimony summarizing evidence furnished by counsel and other 27 experts
  • failure to declare mistrial not abuse of discretion where juror contact was brief and unrelated to trial
  • failure to declare mistrial not abuse of discretion where juror contact was brief and unrelated to trial
  • when evidence is cumulative, the error in admitting it, if any, is not prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ely, Wallace, Reinhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.