Arizona Supreme Court· 10/10/1995
State v. Walden
Citations
- 905 P.2d 974
- 183 Ariz. 595
- 201 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
- 1995 Ariz. LEXIS 99
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that for purposes of A.R.S. § 13-703(F)(1), conviction occurs upon determination of guilt
- concluding evidence introduced on redirect examination of victim was within the scope of cross-examination, given the defendant’s cross-examination attack on purported inconsistencies in the victim’s direct testimony
- noting that Burhans “would have been conscious for several minutes” after the stabbing
- finding bruises on arms and legs, neck and chest injuries, head wound, slash wounds, and strangulation gratuitous violence
- finding signs of a struggle when victim’s hands were intertwined in the electrical cord used to strangle her and blood was sprayed around the room
- reaching this conclusion after “listening to the tape” of the conversation between Jordan and the detective and “reviewing the transcript of the [evidentiary] hearing”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martone, Feldman, Moeller, Corcoran, Zlaxet
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-09-16· cited 452×
- State v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 180×
- State v. SpreitzArizona Supreme Court· 1997-09-11· cited 122×
- State v. NordstromArizona Supreme Court· 2001-06-21· cited 119×
- State v. DoerrArizona Supreme Court· 1998-11-12· cited 114×
- State v. DickensArizona Supreme Court· 1996-10-31· cited 112×
- State v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-09-05· cited 108×
- State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court· 1997-08-26· cited 105×
- State v. CanezArizona Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 94×
- State v. McKinneyArizona Supreme Court· 1996-05-16· cited 94×
- State v. SchackartArizona Supreme Court· 1997-10-30· cited 94×
- State v. CañezArizona Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 80×
- State v. KayerArizona Supreme Court· 1999-06-29· cited 75×
- State v. MataArizona Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 69×
- State v. IvesArizona Supreme Court· 1996-11-07· cited 63×
- State v. MartinezArizona Supreme Court· 2000-05-11· cited 56×
- State v. SansingArizona Supreme Court· 2003-09-24· cited 54×
- State v. PrinceArizona Supreme Court· 2003-01-16· cited 53×
- State v. KempArizona Supreme Court· 1996-02-29· cited 49×
- State v. MendozaWisconsin Supreme Court· 1999-07-08· cited 43×
Cites
80 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 4,161×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,349×
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 1,617×
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,614×
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 1,382×
- Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 1,070×
- Mu'Min v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 804×
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 530×
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-11· cited 423×
- State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-06· cited 374×
- Arave v. CreechSupreme Court· 1993-03-30· cited 361×
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 361×
- Richmond v. LewisSupreme Court· 1992-12-01· cited 349×
- Poland v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1986-05-05· cited 338×
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-13· cited 326×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.