Washington Supreme Court· 9/24/1987

State v. Schaaf

Citations

743 P.2d 240
109 Wash. 2d 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that more recent revisions to the juvenile system have not so transformed it into a criminal prosecution that the right to trial by jury must be afforded
recognizing that juveniles have no right to jury trial and that juvenile proceedings, unlike adult prosecutions, are rehabilitative in nature
recognizing that juveniles have no right to jury trial and that juvenile proceedings, unlike adult prosecutions, are rehabilitative in nature
recognizing that a juvenile may be eligible for a diversion agreement in lieu of prosecution and, if prosecuted and found guilty, will normally be sent to a juvenile detention facility
holding that juveniles form neither a suspect nor semi-suspect class for equal protection purposes
holding that more recent revisions to the juvenile system have not so transformed it into a criminal prosecution that the right to trial by jury must be afforded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodloe, Andersen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

120 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Schaaf

11 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.