Arizona Supreme Court· 10/31/1996

State v. Dickens

Citations

926 P.2d 468
187 Ariz. 1
228 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 44
1996 Ariz. LEXIS 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

lesser-included offense instruction not required if defendant is either guilty of greater offense or not at all
Defendant convicted of felony murder based on armed robbery; the state appeared to have limited its allegations of aggravating circumstances to pecuniary gain, A.R.S. section 13-703(F)(5
lesser-included offense instruction not required if defendant is either guilty of greater offense or not at all
“Although a defendant has a fundamental constitutional right to ... present a defense, the right is limited to the presentation of matters admissible under ordinary evidentiary rules----”
“Although a defendant has a fundamental constitutional right to confront witnesses and present a defense, the right is limited to the presentation of matters admissible under ordinary evidentiary rules . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Zlaket, Moeller, Martone, Druke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

96 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Dickens

36 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.