Arizona Supreme Court· 1/30/1987

State v. LaGrand

Citations

733 P.2d 1066
152 Ariz. 483
1987 Ariz. LEXIS 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “a request for new counsel should be examined with the rights and interest of the defendant in mind tempered by exigencies of judicial economy”
treating appellant’s pro se motion to remove his counsel as a motion for substitute counsel
discussing the factors the superior court should consider when ruling on a motion for change of counsel
listing the factors considered by a trial court when deciding whether to appoint substitute counsel, including the proclivity of the defendant to change counsel and whether new counsel would be confronted with the same conflict as current counsel
Constitutional waiver is an “intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.” (cleaned up)
“A party is entitled to an instruction on any theory reasonably supported by evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Feldman, Jack, Cameron, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.