Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/10/2013

State v. Randolph

Citations

297 Kan. 320
301 P.3d 300
2013 WL 1924038
2013 Kan. LEXIS 454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

acknowledging Stone and reviewing totality of circumstances bearing on defendant’s confession to find it voluntary
finding error not harmless under K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 60-261 where district court applied wrong statutory factors in ruling on departure motion
remanding for resentenc-ing where there was a “reasonable probability” district court might have given different weight to sentencing factors if it had correctly applied the law
when challenged, the prosecution must prove by a preponderance of the evidence the voluntariness of a defendant’s statement to a law enforcement officer
“[I]t is well established that low intelligence alone does not preclude a finding that an accused knowingly and voluntarily waived his or her Miranda rights.”
nonexclusive list of mitigating circumstances in Jessica's Law controls over statutory list of mitigating factors generally applicable under sentencing guidelines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.