Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 190 P.3d 207
  • 286 Kan. 824
  • 2008 Kan. LEXIS 445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that K.S.A. 22-3212(i)'s provision that a district court has the option to impose sanctions it deems \just\ grants discretion in imposing an appropriate sanction for a discovery violation
  • discussing prior Kansas cases, United States Supreme Court decision in Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. 270, 127 S. Ct. 856, 166 L. Ed. 2d 856 [2007]
  • under K.S.A. 21-4721[c][l] appellate court without jurisdiction to consider challenge to presumptive sentence, even if highest term in presumptive grid block handed down
  • defendant’s low intelligence did not preclude a finding that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights
  • statute granting district court option to impose sanctions it deems \just\ grants district court discretion in imposing sanctions
  • K.S.A. 21-4721[c][l] deprives appellate court of jurisdiction to consider defendant’s challenge to a presumptive gridbox sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.