Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/23/2014

State v. Williams

Citations

299 Kan. 509
324 P.3d 1078
2014 WL 2155357
2014 Kan. LEXIS 253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

declining to address confrontation issues for first time on appeal in absence of contemporaneous objection required under K.S.A. 60-404
appellate courts do not independently search the record or attempt to guess the facts the appellant believes support his or her general allegations
\appellate courts presume that the jury followed the [district] court's admonition\
\appellate courts presume that the jury followed the [district] court's admonition\
appellate court will not reweigh evidence or credibility of witnesses
appellate court will not overlook lack of an objection as required by K.S.A. 60-404 even if appellant argues appellate review is necessary to Serve the ends of justice or prevent the denial of defendant’s right to a fair trial; citing other cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

115 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.