Frazier v. Cupp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that officer's lie-that co-defendant confessed-did not render defendant's confession involuntary without other coercive factors, such as a promise of leniency
• holding interrogator’s misrepresentation to suspect that his co-suspect had already confessed did not render suspect’s subsequent confession coerced
• holding interrogator’s misrepresentation to suspect that his co-suspect had already confessed did not render suspect’s subsequent confession involuntary
• noting that misrepresentation by law enforcement is a relevant consideration in the totality-of-the-eircum-stances assessment
• fabricating a co-conspirator’s confession is relevant, but “insufficient in our view to make this otherwise voluntary confession inadmissible”
• rejecting defendant’s argument that because consenter had permission to use only one compartment in bag, he did not have authority to consent to search of entire bag

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).