Supreme Court of Kansas· 2/18/2005

State v. Swanigan

Citations

279 Kan. 18
106 P.3d 39
2005 Kan. LEXIS 58

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding a statement involuntary even when the defendant had been read Miranda warnings, and interviewers were not combative
finding unfair interview technique of telling defendant false information about evidence rendered confession involuntary under the totality of the circumstances
finding threats of specific charges or increased penalty under the other circumstances of the interrogation showed the statements were not voluntary
asking whether law enforcement’s coercion of an involuntary statement in the first interrogation tainted the voluntary statements obtained in a subsequent interrogation
asking whether law enforcement's coercion of an involuntary statement in the first interrogation tainted the voluntary statements obtained in a subsequent interrogation
noting Swanigan changed his story shortly after officers lied to or threatened him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuss, McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Swanigan

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.