Skip to main content

State v. Woods

Citations

  • 301 Kan. 852
  • 348 P.3d 583
  • 2015 Kan. LEXIS 236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a verbal confrontation between husband and wife was not enough to cause an ordinary person to lose control of his or her actions
  • holding that a verbal confrontation between husband and wife was not enough to cause an ordinary person to lose control of his or her actions
  • holding that a verbal confrontation between husband and wife was not enough to cause an ordinary person to lose control of their actions
  • finding that substantial competent evidence supported the district court's finding that defendant's confession was voluntary where he easily understood the questions posed and answered appropriately even though he had been previously diagnosed with schizophrenia
  • noting prior schizophrenia diagnoses yet holding \there is no evidence [the defendant's] responses were unknowing or involuntary because he was suffering from schizophrenia\
  • noting prior 17 schizophrenia diagnosis yet holding \there is no evidence [the defendant's] responses were unknowing or involuntary because he was suffering from schizophrenia\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.