Supreme Court of Kansas· 3/19/2004

State v. Mays

Citations

85 P.3d 1208
277 Kan. 359
2004 Kan. LEXIS 141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding there was sufficient evidence to find the defendant committed overt acts in furtherance of a conspiracy to commit first-degree murder by obtaining a weapon and driving around looking for victims
explaining that a defendant's low intellect should never dispose of the issue of constitutional voluntariness
rejecting claim that juvenile court proceeding used to authorize juvenile’s prosecution as adult violated Apprendi, reasoning that transfer statute did not involve guilt or innocence but only appropriate system for juvenile offender
defendant’s failure to timely object to alleged hearsay statements precludes defendant from raising issue on appeal, even where alleging violation of Confrontation Clause of Sixth Amendment
defendant's failure to timely object to alleged hearsay statements precludes defendant from raising issue on appeal, even where alleging violation of Confrontation Clause of Sixth Amendment
to preserve hearsay challenge for appeal, the defendant must make contemporaneous objection to complained-about evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.