Skip to main content

State v. Lewis

Citations

  • 299 Kan. 828
  • 326 P.3d 387
  • 2014 WL 2619888
  • 2014 Kan. LEXIS 281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no Seibert violation because “[t]he pre-warning interview lasted only 10 minutes with nothing of substance revealed”
  • rejecting invited error argument based on defendants mere acquiescence to jury question response
  • declining to apply invited error when defendant acquiesced to jury question response
  • declining to apply invited error when defendant acquiesced to jury question response
  • applying this bifurcated standard when determining whether an interrogation is custodial
  • after interview, defendant was questioned further, detained, and arrested—a circumstance weighing in favor of custody

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier, Biles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.