Skip to main content

State v. Wright

Citations

  • 224 P.3d 1159
  • 290 Kan. 194
  • 2010 Kan. LEXIS 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring super- sufficiency of the evidence \to ensure a criminal defendant's statutory entitlement to jury unanimity\
  • finding the alternative means for committing rape after an examination of the statutory language
  • requiring substantial evidence supporting each means of criminal element included in instruction
  • requiring substantial evidence supporting each means of criminal element included in instruction
  • reversal required if State fails to present sufficient evidence to permit a jury to find each alternative means of committing the crime beyond a reasonable doubt
  • “Tim- ley required sufficiency of evidence to support each alternative means upon which a jury is instructed, in order to protect a criminal defendant’s right to a unanimous jury verdict.” [Emphasis added.]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.