Oregon Supreme Court· 5/12/1994
State v. Reid
Citations
- 872 P.2d 416
- 319 Or. 65
- 43 A.L.R. 5th 803
- 1994 Ore. LEXIS 40
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the presence of children does not support a finding that all persons present at a residence are engaged in criminal activity
- stating that the Supreme Court’s construction of a statute “becomes a part of the statute as if written into it at the time of its enactment”
- noting that persons reasonably expected to be approaching the front door of a private residence for innocent purposes include mail carriers, package delivery persons, volunteers soliciting donations for charitable purposes, and neighbors seeking to borrow sugar
- noting that persons reasonably expected to be approaching the front door of a private residence for innocent purposes include mail carriers, package delivery persons, volunteers soliciting donations for charitable purposes, and neighbors seeking to borrow sugar
- holding an APP warrant “failed to satisfy” Oregon’s statutory requirements because “the affidavit did not demonstrate probable cause to believe that all ‘persons present’ on the premises would be associated with the criminal activity taking place there”
- authorizing a search of “persons present” impermissibly allowed a search of persons for which there might be no probable cause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis, Graber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court· 1998-09-02· cited 124×
- State v. MansorOregon Supreme Court· 2018-06-28· cited 85×
- State v. Bock (A169480)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-31· cited 47×
- State v. TurayOregon Supreme Court· 2023-06-15· cited 34×
- Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School DistrictOregon Supreme Court· 2006-09-28· cited 32×
- State v. Pelster/BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28· cited 23×
- Godfrey v. Fred Meyer StoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-23· cited 21×
- State v. PriorSupreme Court of Iowa· 2000-09-07· cited 20×
- State v. AndersenOregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-09· cited 19×
- State v. CarterOregon Supreme Court· 2006-11-24· cited 18×
- State v. MansorWashington County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-27· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. SouzaMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-02-04· cited 17×
- State v. FriddleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-14· cited 12×
- United States v. GuadarramaE.D. Wisconsin· 2001-01-12· cited 10×
- State v. VesaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-22· cited 10×
- State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-11-06· cited 10×
- State v. TraxOregon Supreme Court· 2003-08-14· cited 8×
- State v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-09-18· cited 7×
- State v. BeaglesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-08-28· cited 5×
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-20· cited 4×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
- Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-01· cited 91×
- State v. BlackburnOregon Supreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 61×
- State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court· 1992-04-23· cited 34×
- State v. DevineOregon Supreme Court· 1989-02-14· cited 24×
- State v. IngramCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-11-21· cited 15×
- State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-08-18· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.