Skip to main content

State v. Reid

Citations

  • 872 P.2d 416
  • 319 Or. 65
  • 43 A.L.R. 5th 803
  • 1994 Ore. LEXIS 40

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the presence of children does not support a finding that all persons present at a residence are engaged in criminal activity
  • stating that the Supreme Court’s construction of a statute “becomes a part of the statute as if written into it at the time of its enactment”
  • noting that persons reasonably expected to be approaching the front door of a private residence for innocent purposes include mail carriers, package delivery persons, volunteers soliciting donations for charitable purposes, and neighbors seeking to borrow sugar
  • noting that persons reasonably expected to be approaching the front door of a private residence for innocent purposes include mail carriers, package delivery persons, volunteers soliciting donations for charitable purposes, and neighbors seeking to borrow sugar
  • holding an APP warrant “failed to satisfy” Oregon’s statutory requirements because “the affidavit did not demonstrate probable cause to believe that all ‘persons present’ on the premises would be associated with the criminal activity taking place there”
  • authorizing a search of “persons present” impermissibly allowed a search of persons for which there might be no probable cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis, Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.