Oregon Supreme Court· 4/23/1992
State v. Ingram
Citations
- 831 P.2d 674
- 313 Or. 139
- 1992 Ore. LEXIS 37
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the legislature intended that failure to comply with ORS 133.565(2)(b) would result in suppression of evidence
- concluding that the warrant was insufficiently particular, and therefore invalid, because \the phrase 'all vehicles *** associated with the occupants of said premises' is so standardless that the executing officer must employ discretion in deciding which vehicles to search\
- explaining that warrants must be specific enough to remove police discretion in choosing which things to search
- construing ORS 133.565 to be “at least as restrictive as the constitutional prohibition against general warrants”
- construing ORS 133.565(2)(b) to be “at least as restrictive as the constitutional prohibition against general warrants”
- warrant authorizing officers to search “all vehicles determined to be associated with the occupants of said premises” overbroad
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. Bock (A169480)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-31· cited 47×
- State v. ReidOregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-12· cited 43×
- State v. SavathCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-07-17· cited 42×
- State v. AndersenOregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-09· cited 19×
- State v. CarterOregon Supreme Court· 2006-11-24· cited 18×
- State v. MunroOregon Supreme Court· 2005-12-15· cited 18×
- Morton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-08-24· cited 18×
- State v. MansorWashington County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-27· cited 18×
- State v. TrenaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-08-12· cited 16×
- State v. FriddleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-14· cited 12×
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-06-15· cited 10×
- State v. TraxOregon Supreme Court· 2003-08-14· cited 8×
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-09-10· cited 7×
- State v. BeaglesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-08-28· cited 5×
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-20· cited 4×
- State v. BreedwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-12-14· cited 4×
- State v. JOST/OREGON-WASHINGTON RECOVERY CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-08-25· cited 3×
- State v. Martin/DillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-10-11· cited 3×
- People v. PachecoSupreme Court of Colorado· 2006-10-10· cited 2×
- State v. LeeOregon Supreme Court· 2025-04-24· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.