Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/2/2019

State v. Cannon

Citations

299 Or. App. 616
450 P.3d 567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that general statements based on the officer’s training and experience with technology and sex crime investigations did not provide probable cause to search a broad array of the defendant’s electronic devices
noting that general statements based on the officer’s training and experience with technology and sex crime investigations did not provide probable cause to search a broad array of the defendant’s electronic devices
“[T]he gravamen of an overbreadth challenge is an asserted lack of probable cause * * *.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
“[T]he gravamen of an overbreadth challenge is an asserted lack of probable cause * * *.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
warrant was over- broad in part because “the affidavit failed to establish that defendant even owned any of the devices indicated in the warrant, other than the single Samsung cell phone”
warrant was over- broad in part because “the affidavit failed to establish that defendant even owned any of the devices indicated in the warrant, other than the single Samsung cell phone”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shorr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.