Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/7/2017

State v. Burnham

Citations

287 Or. App. 661
403 P.3d 466
2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 1039

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that warrant authorizing search of multiple electronic devices was overbroad when it did not establish facts showing that it was more likely than not that images had been transmitted to all of the defendant’s devices
warrant was overbroad where, at best, the affidavit established a possibility that photos had been transmitted from the defendant’s phone to other devices, but that possibility did not rise to the level of probable cause to search each of the devices authorized by the warrant
warrant was overbroad where, at best, the affidavit established a possibility that photos had been transmitted from the defendant’s phone to other devices, but that possibility did not rise to the level of probable cause to search each of the devices authorized by the warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrett, Lagesen, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.