State v. Bush

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disregarding “same act or transaction” language in indictment was not error because the indictment still alleged complete offenses
• where warrant included incorrect street address of property to be searched, but contained correct tax lot number and a precise description by which officers could distinguish property from other properties, warrant was valid
• where warrant included incorrect street address of property to be searched, but contained correct tax lot number and a precise description by which officers could distinguish property from other properties, warrant was valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Mansor
  Washington County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-27· cited 18×
• State v. Isbell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-12-26· cited 7×
• Heine v. Bank of Oswego
  D. Oregon· 2015-11-13· cited 7×
• Matter of Marriage of Menard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-03-13· cited 6×
• Williamson v. Schiedler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-11-24· cited 4×
• State v. Trax
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-30· cited 4×
• State v. Breedwell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-12-14· cited 4×