Oregon Supreme Court· 6/21/1973
State v. Blackburn
Citations
- 511 P.2d 381
- 266 Or. 28
- 1973 Ore. LEXIS 330
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a historical motivation for Article I, section 9, was a fear of general warrants
- if warrant describes premises so as to make invasion of privacy interests possible without probable cause, then warrant too broad and constitutionally defective
- if a “warrant describes premises in such a way that it makes possible the invasion of this interest in privacy without the foundation of probable cause for the search, the warrant is too broad and therefore constitutionally defective”
- a warrant must identify with reasonable certainty what to search
- unique “ECURB” description of apartment was contained in the warrant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Connell, Denecke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court· 1978-10-24· cited 244×
- State v. TannerOregon Supreme Court· 1987-11-17· cited 194×
- United States v. BershchanskySecond Circuit· 2015-06-05· cited 122×
- State v. MansorOregon Supreme Court· 2018-06-28· cited 85×
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-06-13· cited 78×
- State v. Bock (A169480)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-31· cited 47×
- State v. ReidOregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-12· cited 43×
- State v. SavathCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-07-17· cited 42×
- State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court· 1992-04-23· cited 34×
- State v. TurayOregon Supreme Court· 2023-06-15· cited 34×
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-05-28· cited 27×
- State v. DevineOregon Supreme Court· 1989-02-14· cited 24×
- People v. Del AlamoSupreme Court of Colorado· 1981-02-09· cited 20×
- State v. MansorWashington County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-27· cited 18×
- State v. IngramCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-11-21· cited 15×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-04-10· cited 14×
- State v. FloranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-10-29· cited 13×
- State v. FriddleCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-14· cited 12×
- McKinney v. East Orange Mun. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1995-10-31· cited 10×
- State v. VesaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-22· cited 10×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-06-04· cited 2,291×
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-11-23· cited 1,968×
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
- Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 727×
- United States v. Savannah Hinton, United States of America v. Susie Powers, Alias Susie PendletonSeventh Circuit· 1955-02-10· cited 141×
- Steele v. United States No. 2Supreme Court· 1925-04-13· cited 124×
- Harold Hanger v. United States of America, Gale Mixen v. United States of America, Loretta Meyer v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1968-06-28· cited 121×
- United States v. SklaroffS.D. Florida· 1971-02-11· cited 103×
- State v. CortmanOregon Supreme Court· 1968-10-23· cited 80×
- State v. DouglasOregon Supreme Court· 1971-09-22· cited 79×
- United States v. JosephE.D. Pennsylvania· 1959-06-12· cited 64×
- The PEOPLE v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1962-11-30· cited 43×
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1966-03-07· cited 34×
- United States v. PisanoS.D. New York· 1961-03-15· cited 31×
- People v. FitzwaterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-03-27· cited 31×
- United States v. GoodmanN.D. Indiana· 1970-03-20· cited 24×
- United States v. ConteeDistrict of Columbia· 1959-02-10· cited 18×
- People v. MeccaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1971-04-30· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.