Skip to main content

State v. Blackburn

Citations

  • 511 P.2d 381
  • 266 Or. 28
  • 1973 Ore. LEXIS 330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a historical motivation for Article I, section 9, was a fear of general warrants
  • if warrant describes premises so as to make invasion of privacy interests possible without probable cause, then warrant too broad and constitutionally defective
  • if a “warrant describes premises in such a way that it makes possible the invasion of this interest in privacy without the foundation of probable cause for the search, the warrant is too broad and therefore constitutionally defective”
  • a warrant must identify with reasonable certainty what to search
  • unique “ECURB” description of apartment was contained in the warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connell, Denecke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.