State v. Roden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, given the “way the issues were framed, the [scientific] evidence * * * was tangential, and therefore harmless”
• holding that, given the “way the issues were framed, the [scientific] evidence * * * was tangential, and therefore harmless”
• concluding that wrongly admitted tes- timony that “undercut defendant’s theory as to what caused [the victim’s] death” and “contradicted circumstantial evi- dence upon which defendant relied” may have influenced the jury’s verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 292×
• State v. O'Key
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-07-07· cited 243×
• State v. Mansor
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-06-28· cited 85×
• State v. Whitmore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-07-24· cited 24×
• State v. Mansor
  Washington County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-27· cited 18×
• State v. Basua
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-24· cited 5×