Arizona Supreme Court· 1/16/1990
State v. Lopez
Citations
- 786 P.2d 959
- 163 Ariz. 108
- 52 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 5
- 1990 Ariz. LEXIS 4
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- creating substantial risk of physical injury does not necessarily involve the use or threat of violence
- resisting arrest conviction does not qualify as a § 13-703(F)(2) aggravating circumstance
- resisting arrest conviction does not qualify as a § 13-703(F)(2) aggravating circumstance
- toxicologist’s testimony that tests revealed sexual penetration occurred before victim’s death disposed of defendant’s argument that sexual assault occurred after death
- toxicologist's testimony that tests revealed sexual penetration occurred before victim's death disposed of defendant's argument that sexual assault occurred after death
- “A Willits instruction is appropriate when the state destroys or loses evidence potentially helpful to the defendant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moeller, Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Corcoran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- State v. RingArizona Supreme Court· 2003-04-03· cited 325×
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court· 1990-12-14· cited 276×
- State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court· 1995-10-26· cited 217×
- State v. SalazarArizona Supreme Court· 1992-12-17· cited 207×
- State v. RamirezArizona Supreme Court· 1994-03-24· cited 169×
- Donald Edward Beaty v. Terry Stewart, DirectorNinth Circuit· 2002-08-27· cited 164×
- State v. GallegosArizona Supreme Court· 1994-03-15· cited 158×
- State v. FierroaArizona Supreme Court· 1990-12-18· cited 105×
- State v. CanezArizona Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 94×
- State v. McKinneyArizona Supreme Court· 1996-05-16· cited 94×
- State v. StokleyArizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-27· cited 91×
- State v. CañezArizona Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 80×
- State v. SchaafArizona Supreme Court· 1991-10-16· cited 65×
- State of Arizona v. Robert Charles GlissendorfArizona Supreme Court· 2014-07-18· cited 64×
- State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court· 1997-04-29· cited 59×
- State v. SansingArizona Supreme Court· 2001-07-02· cited 58×
- State v. SansingArizona Supreme Court· 2003-09-24· cited 54×
- Lopez v. RyanNinth Circuit· 2011-01-20· cited 47×
- State v. LopezArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-24· cited 41×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- Poland v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1986-05-05· cited 338×
- State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-01· cited 219×
- State v. WillitsArizona Supreme Court· 1964-06-11· cited 207×
- Hydroculture, Inc. v. CoopersSupreme Court· 1983-11-14· cited 199×
- State v. CelayaArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-17· cited 138×
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 109×
- Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court· 1952-07-16· cited 97×
- State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court· 1983-05-12· cited 95×
- State v. NealArizona Supreme Court· 1984-12-04· cited 83×
- State v. EncinasArizona Supreme Court· 1982-06-02· cited 78×
- State v. WoratzeckArizona Supreme Court· 1982-12-17· cited 67×
- State v. RamosArizona Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 62×
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court· 1988-02-25· cited 61×
- State v. RomanoskyArizona Supreme Court· 1989-10-19· cited 50×
- State v. AriasArizona Supreme Court· 1982-02-16· cited 48×
- State v. VillafuerteArizona Supreme Court· 1984-10-25· cited 46×
- State v. McGeeArizona Supreme Court· 1962-03-28· cited 45×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.