Arizona Supreme Court· 2/14/2002

State v. Cañez

Citations

202 Ariz. 133
42 P.3d 564
367 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 37
2002 Ariz. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that helplessness and senselessness alone are not enough
noting the State “must carry its burden of proof on uncontested issues as well as contested ones” and, therefore, rejecting an assertion that photos of the deceased were irrelevant because they were “probative only of matters not in dispute”
“The method and scope of voir dire is left to the discretion of the trial judge.”
pursuant to Rule 803(19), son of murder victim allowed to testify to his father's birth date and age; victim's age can be proven by \testimony of people who knew him\
“Because the trial court is best situated to conduct the Rule 403 balance, we will reverse its ruling only for abuse of discretion.” (citation omitted)
a person is seized for Fourth Amendment purposes when \police conduct would have communicated to a reasonable person that he was not at liberty to ignore the police presence and go about his business.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Jones, Megregor, Zlaket

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

103 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.