Arizona Supreme Court· 5/16/1996
State v. McKinney
Citations
- 917 P.2d 1214
- 185 Ariz. 567
- 216 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 103
- 1996 Ariz. LEXIS 55
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the (F)(2) aggravating factor does not apply to offenses which can be committed recklessly
- noting that Judge Sheldon “did not improperly exclude mitigating evidence at sentencing and the mitigating evidence is not of great weight”
- holding F.2 aggravating circumstance applied where defendant was simultaneously convicted of first and second degree murder because the convictions occurred before the first degree murder sentencing
- noting that Judge Sheldon “did not improperly exclude mitigating evidence at sentencing and the mitigating evidence is not of great weight”
- explaining the Arizona procedure for reviewing death sentences on direct appeal
- reviewing factual and procedural history in a consolidated case involving Hedlund
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feldman, Martone, Zlaket, Moeller, Corcoran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. NewellArizona Supreme Court· 2006-04-26· cited 376×
- State v. DavoltArizona Supreme Court· 2004-02-17· cited 223×
- State v. DonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-09-26· cited 216×
- State v. TrostleArizona Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 187×
- State v. HoskinsArizona Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 180×
- State v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court· 1998-10-20· cited 158×
- James McKinney v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2015-12-29· cited 154×
- State v. DoerrArizona Supreme Court· 1998-11-12· cited 114×
- State v. DickensArizona Supreme Court· 1996-10-31· cited 112×
- State v. Van AdamsArizona Supreme Court· 1999-06-18· cited 112×
- State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court· 1997-08-26· cited 105×
- State v. CruzArizona Supreme Court· 2008-04-21· cited 98×
- State v. SchackartArizona Supreme Court· 1997-10-30· cited 94×
- United States v. Michael D. JohnsonSixth Circuit· 2007-05-25· cited 93×
- Florez v. SargeantArizona Supreme Court· 1996-05-16· cited 90×
- David Ramirez v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2019-09-11· cited 84×
- State v. ToweryArizona Supreme Court· 2003-02-26· cited 66×
- State v. SansingArizona Supreme Court· 2001-07-02· cited 58×
- State v. MartinezArizona Supreme Court· 2000-05-11· cited 56×
- State v. RogovichArizona Supreme Court· 1997-02-04· cited 45×
Cites
81 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 6,497×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,797×
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,080×
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,589×
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- Boyle v. LandrySupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 410×
- State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-06· cited 374×
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 361×
- State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 250×
- State v. SpearsArizona Supreme Court· 1996-01-04· cited 231×
- State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-01· cited 219×
- Landry v. DaleyN.D. Illinois· 1968-03-01· cited 214×
- State v. SalazarArizona Supreme Court· 1992-12-17· cited 207×
- State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 206×
- State v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court· 1978-07-20· cited 206×
- Hydroculture, Inc. v. CoopersSupreme Court· 1983-11-14· cited 199×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.