Donald Edward Beaty v. Terry Stewart, Director

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if Arizona habeas petitioner “has any 5 unexhausted claims” they are “procedurally defaulted . . . because he is now time-barred 6 under Arizona law from going back to state court”
• holding that if 17 Arizona habeas petitioner \has any unexhausted claims\ they are \procedurally defaulted 18 . . . because he is now time-barred under Arizona law from going back to state court\
• finding petitioner failed to show that “Arizona’s time bar is not adequate or 5 independent”
• finding 26 that petitioner’s unexhausted claims were procedurally defaulted, “because he is now time- 27 barred under Arizona law from going back to state court”
• finding claim “that the 19 trial court improperly imposed consecutive sentences in violation of Arizona law” was 20 “not cognizable in federal habeas proceedings”
• finding no available state court remedies and noting that petitioner did not attempt to raise any exceptions to Rule 32.2(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).