State v. Romanosky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant’s argument that because victim was not asked to make an in-court identification at trial, trial court erred by allowing officer to testify about victim’s response to photo lineup
• “Absent a clear abuse of discretion, we will not disturb a trial court’s ruling on the admissibility of evidence.”
• witness’ testimony that Florida souvenir T-shirts found in defendant’s trailer on day after murder were similar to ones she had purchased on trip to Florida immediately prior to murder established sufficient foundation for admission of the T-shirts
• “[I]ri some circumstances out-of-court declarations will not be excluded as hearsay when they are not. offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted but to prove their effect upon a person whose conduct is in question, such as an arresting police officer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).