Arizona Supreme Court· 2/25/1988

State v. Hansen

Citations

751 P.2d 951
156 Ariz. 291
2 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 17
1988 Ariz. LEXIS 31

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

jurors’ discussion of prior trial was brief and inconsequential, and there was no discussion of previous verdict
“[T]he trial court is in a better position to judge whether [a] prosecutor is unduly sarcastic, his tone of voice, facial expressions, and their effect on the jury, if any.”
\[W]hether to grant a ... motion for dismissal is within the sound discretion of the trial court\
“[T]he trial court is in a better position to judge whether [a] prosecutor is unduly sarcastic, his tone of voice, facial expressions, and their effect on the jury, if any.”
“[W]e note that the trial court is in a better position to judge whether the prosecutor is unduly sarcastic, his tone of voice, facial expressions, and their effect on the jury, if any.”
discussing circumstances under which spoliation instruction is warranted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.