Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/14/1998

State v. Hardy

Citations

963 S.W.2d 516
1997 WL 716775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that the Fourth Amendment imposes certain reasonableness requirements as a condition for obtaining blood evidence
holding that the interest in safeguarding the privacy of medical records is not strong enough to require protection of blood-alcohol test results from tests taken by hospitals solely for medical purposes after a traffic accident
indicating that even a plurality opinion from the court of criminal appeals is not binding precedent
indicating that even a plurality opinion from the court of criminal appeals is not binding precedent
indicating that even a plurality opinion from the court of criminal appeals is not binding precedent
holding appellant does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in blood-alcohol test results taken by hospital personnel solely for medical purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Price, McCormick, Mansfield, Holland, Womack, Baird, Overstreet, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

239 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Hardy

152 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.