Supreme Court of Minnesota· 4/9/1998

State v. Hardy

Citations

577 N.W.2d 212
1998 Minn. LEXIS 165
1998 WL 162148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that search occurred when police ordered suspect to open his mouth so they could look for contraband
stating that “the primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct” by eliminating temptation for police officers to proceed with less than constitutional prerequisites for search and seizure
excluding evidence forcibly extracted from defendant’s mouth after defendant fled “in reaction to the illegal search attempted by the police”
reiterating that “the primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct” and that by excluding evidence, “we seek to eliminate the incentive for police officers who have detained a person on a Terry stop to overstep the limits of the stop”
excluding evidence obtained through illegal search “to eliminate the incentive for police officers who have detained a person on a Terry stop to overstep the limits of the stop”
“[T]he primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blatz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.