Skip to main content

Rocha v. State

Citations

  • 16 S.W.3d 1
  • 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 41
  • 2000 WL 368923

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an argument that fails to cite to supporting authority in support of claim presents nothing for review
  • holding that an argument that fails to cite to supporting authority in support of claim presents nothing for review
  • holding that an argument that fails to cite to supporting authority in support of claim presents nothing for review
  • holding that the exclusionary rule of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure did not apply to treaty violations
  • holding that an argument that fails to cite to supporting authority in support of claim presents nothing for review
  • holding that when defendant fails to cite supporting authority, nothing is presented for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, McCormick, Mansfield, Womack, Keasler, Holland, Meyers, Price, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

319 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rocha v. State

29 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.