United States v. Dionisio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that compelling the production of voice exemplars for use in a grand jury proceeding would not be a search
• holding that compelling the production of voice exemplars for use in a grand jury proceeding would not be a search
• holding that compelling the production of voice exemplars for use in a grand jury proceeding would not be a search
• holding that a person does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy with regard to physical characteristics which he or she routinely exposes to public view
• holding that “applying paraffin casts to the accused’s hands [to test for gunpowder reside] did not violate the fourth . . . amendment[] any more than fingerprinting”
• concluding that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in one’s appearance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).