State v. Hardy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, for purposes of claims under Maryland Rule 4-215, “meaningful trial proceedings” began with the voir dire process in a criminal trial
• \[W]e hold th[e] `meaningful trial proceedings' have begun after a trial court has begun the voir dire process in a criminal trial.\
• “A defendant makes such a request when his or her statement constitutes more a declaration of dissatisfaction with counsel than an explicit request to discharge.”
• “[T]he proper resolution of this issue is that ‘meaningful trial proceedings’ have begun when a request to discharge counsel is made during voir dire.”
• “We refused to draw a bright line definition delimiting the precise moment that marks the beginning of ‘meaningful trial proceedings!.]’ ”
• defendant stated that he was “ ‘thinking about changing the attorney or something’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pinkney v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-22· cited 23×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-11-22· cited 19×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-21· cited 15×
• Bey v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-06-29· cited 8×
• Wood v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-12-21· cited 7×
• Gambrill v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-02-27· cited 5×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-12-19· cited 5×
• Weathers v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-12-01· cited 4×
• Marshall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-08-24· cited 4×
• Westray v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-06-25· cited 2×
• Barkley v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-09-02
• Hargett v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-11-19

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Johnson v. Zerbst
  Supreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
• United States v. Jorn
  Supreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
• Illinois v. Somerville
  Supreme Court· 1973-02-27· cited 1,368×
• People v. Cummings
  California Supreme Court· 1993-04-29· cited 463×
• People v. Windham
  California Supreme Court· 1977-03-15· cited 383×
• United States v. Dougherty
  D.C. Circuit· 1972-06-30· cited 309×
• Don Garriga Chapman v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1977-06-08· cited 191×
• North v. North
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-10-25· cited 162×
• United States v. Raphael Plattner
  Second Circuit· 1964-03-31· cited 156×
• United States ex rel. Maldonado v. Denno
  Second Circuit· 1965-07-12· cited 144×
• In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-10· cited 138×
• Parren v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-04-06· cited 135×
• United States v. Tyrone Walker, Walter Diaz, A/K/A Eric Rogers, and Anthony Walker, A/K/A Tony Walker
  Second Circuit· 1998-04-15· cited 114×
• United States v. Albert A. Lawrence
  Fourth Circuit· 1979-09-21· cited 92×
• Abeokuto v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-02-13· cited 92×
• United States v. Jay R. Bishop, United States of America v. Gene R. Cardenaz
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-05-30· cited 89×
• United States v. Trunnell Levett Price, and Arnold Lewis Coffey
  Ninth Circuit· 1973-03-05· cited 81×
• State of Az v. Christopher George Theodore Lamar
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2003-07-17· cited 77×
• Blondes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-01-09· cited 66×