State v. Hardy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the prosecutor tried to use the contents of a tip for a hearsay purpose, but that even a limited elicitation for a nonhearsay purpose would have been unjustifiably prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-12-23· cited 97×
• State v. Litzau
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-30· cited 69×
• State v. Cermak
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-04-05· cited 47×
• State v. Hudlow
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-05-13· cited 31×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-06-10· cited 27×
• State v. Ferguson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-10-19· cited 18×
• State v. Carr
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-02-01· cited 14×
• State of Washington v. Thomas Robert Hudlow
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-05-13

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Oscar Mancillas and Charles Lowry
  Seventh Circuit· 1978-07-25· cited 128×
• State v. Olkon
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-29· cited 113×
• Hott v. Indiana
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-26· cited 107×
• State v. Turnipseed
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-09-12· cited 104×
• United States v. Telesforo Ray Gomez, and Cayetano Morin-Degollado
  Fifth Circuit· 1976-05-26· cited 48×
• State v. Ford
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-06· cited 26×