Skip to main content

State v. Hardy

Citations

  • 946 P.2d 1175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that victims’ statements made “minutes” after robbery were admissible under excited utterance exception
  • commenting that “[d]rug convictions are not crimes of ‘dishonesty or false statement’ like perjury or criminal fraud and thus [Rule 609] does not apply”
  • \Excited utterances are spontaneous statements made while under the influence of external physical shock before declarant has time to calm down enough to make a calculated statement based on the self-interest.\
  • “Excited utterances are spontaneous statements made while under the influence of external physical shock before the declarant has time to calm down enough to make a calculated statement based on self-interest.”
  • \Drug convictions are not crimes of 'dishonesty or false statement' like perjury or criminal fraud and thus [rule 609(a)(2) ] does not apply.\
  • “Drug convictions are not crimes of ‘dishonesty or false statement’ like perjury or criminal fraud and thus [rule 609(a)(2)] does not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sanders

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.