Oregon Supreme Court· 6/5/1992

State v. Davis

Citations

834 P.2d 1008
313 Or. 246
1992 Ore. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that given the emphasis placed on individual rights by the Oregon Constitution, Oregon’s search and seizure provision applies no matter “where that evidence was obtained (in-state or out-of-state
holding that the admissibility of evidence in an Oregon prosecution obtained by law enforcement officials outside the state is tested by Oregon Constitutional provisions
holding that the admissibility of evidence in an Oregon prosecution obtained by law enforcement officials outside the state is tested by Oregon Constitutional provisions
holding that the exclusionary rule is based on personal rights theory and not deterrence
holding that given the emphasis placed on individual rights by the Oregon Constitution, Oregon’s search and seizure provision applies no matter “where that evidence was obtained (in-state or out-of-state), or what governmental entity (local, state, federal, or out-of-state
holding that protection against unreasonable searches and seizures under Article I, section 9, includes right \to be free from the use of evidence that has been obtained in violation of the defendant's rights prescribed by that provision\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Peterson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.