Supreme Court· 6/15/1988

Arizona v. Roberson

Citations

486 U.S. 675
108 S. Ct. 2093
100 L. Ed. 2d 704
1988 U.S. LEXIS 2726
56 U.S.L.W. 4590

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the Edwards rule applies even when the suspect’s request for the cessation of questioning occurs in a separate criminal investigation
holding that reinterrogation of defendant, who remained in police custody, three days after he requested attorney violated defendant's Miranda right to counsel
concluding that Edwards applies when a police-initiated interrogation following a suspect’s request for counsel occurs in the context of a separate investigation
holding that reinterrogation of defendant, who remained in police custody, three days after he requested attorney violated defendant's Miranda right to counsel
holding that police may not question a defendant about any unrelated crimes after invocation of the right to counsel, even if such crimes are the subject of a separate investigation
holding that police may not question a defendant about any unrelated crimes after invocation of the right to counsel, even if such crimes are the subject of a separate investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Scalia, Kennedy, Rehnquist, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

637 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Arizona v. Roberson

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.