Hawaii Supreme Court· 8/9/2011

State v. Torres

Citations

262 P.3d 1006
125 Haw. 382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

writing that “the application of the Hawai’i exclusionary rule factors in future cases would deter any federal and state cooperation to evade state law”
stating that because Hawaii’s exclusionary rule protects privacy rights of defendant, those rights must “be given substantial weight when another jurisdiction’s law is involved”
holding the exclusion of the evidence obtained by the federal authorities would deter future violations of state law even though no state actors were involved in the present search
holding the exclusion of the evidence obtained by the federal authorities would deter future violations of state law even though no state actors were involved in the present search
holding the exclusion of the evidence obtained by the federal authorities would deter future violations of state law even though no state actors were involved in the present search
“[Our exclusionary rule is] unlike the exclusionary rule of the federal government and some other jurisdictions insofar as it guarantees individual privacy rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Acoba, Duffy, Recktenwald, Nakayama

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.