State v. Vondehn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Article I, section 12, in addition to prohibiting the use of testimonial evidence acquired as a result of its violation, “also protects a person from being compelled in the first instance to furnish evidence”
• suppressing the defendant’s post-Miranda-warning incriminating statements and physical evidence obtained in a consent search as the unattenuated product of the defendant’s incriminating prewarning statements
• giving of Miranda warnings insufficient to break causal relationship between earlier Miranda violation under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution and the defendant’s post- Miranda statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).