Oregon Supreme Court· 7/1/1993

State v. Rodriguez

Citations

854 P.2d 399
317 Or. 27
1993 Ore. LEXIS 95

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that INS agent “did not trade on or otherwise take advantage of’ unlawful arrest to obtain the defendant’s consent to search (emphases added)
concluding that INS agent “did not trade on or otherwise take advantage of ” unlawful arrest to obtain the defendant’s consent to search (emphasis added)
holding that suppression of secondary evidence depends on whether the police obtained the evidence through an “exploitation” of the prior illegality
concluding that INS agent “did not trade on or otherwise take advantage of ” unlawful arrest to obtain the defendant’s consent to search (emphases added)
concluding that although federal agents acted under authority of federal law in conducting warrantless search of defendant’s apartment, state constitutional protections apply to evidence prosecutor seeks to use in state prosecution
holding that unlawful police conduct will render evidence obtained in a later consent search inadmissible when the police exploit — that is, take advantage of — the circumstances of their unlawful conduct to obtain that consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette, Fadeley, Unis, Van Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.